http://blog.chungyc.org/2008/07/god-of-the-gaps/ Random musings in a variety of subjects, from science to religion. Wed, 08 Feb 2012 06:22:14 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://blog.chungyc.org/2008/07/god-of-the-gaps/comment-page-1/#comment-460 Gerlach Wed, 14 Jan 2009 03:50:05 +0000 http://tempblog.usurith.org/?p=56#comment-460 I particularly enjoy how ID advocates try to deny that their position is nothing more than a god-of-the-gaps argument. "Oh no, ID is supported by positive evidence for design", they say. But when you look at these supposed arguments, like Dembski's "explanatory filter", they all ultimately boil down to "I don't know how X could have happened naturally, therefore the magic man done it." Incredibly inane stuff I particularly enjoy how ID advocates try to deny that their position is nothing more than a god-of-the-gaps argument. "Oh no, ID is supported by positive evidence for design", they say. But when you look at these supposed arguments, like Dembski's "explanatory filter", they all ultimately boil down to "I don't know how X could have happened naturally, therefore the magic man done it." Incredibly inane stuff

]]> http://blog.chungyc.org/2008/07/god-of-the-gaps/comment-page-1/#comment-15 Gerlach Sat, 12 Jul 2008 04:00:00 +0000 http://tempblog.usurith.org/?p=56#comment-15 I particularly enjoy how ID advocates try to deny that their position is nothing more than a god-of-the-gaps argument. "Oh no, ID is supported by positive evidence for design", they say. But when you look at these supposed arguments, like Dembski's "explanatory filter", they all ultimately boil down to "I don't know how X could have happened naturally, therefore the magic man done it." Incredibly inane stuff I particularly enjoy how ID advocates try to deny that their position is nothing more than a god-of-the-gaps argument. "Oh no, ID is supported by positive evidence for design", they say. But when you look at these supposed arguments, like Dembski's "explanatory filter", they all ultimately boil down to "I don't know how X could have happened naturally, therefore the magic man done it." Incredibly inane stuff

]]>